![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
The Notechart Guru
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 18
Posts: 974
Points: 0
|
A bit off-topic, but it's important, so I put it here.
Please fill this out as fully as possible. Take your time with it. Send it to me any way you want. (PM, E-mail, IM, file transfer, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Amateur
|
Just a thought pestering me, but is this survey related to today's date or is it actually serious? (no offense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Notechart Guru
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 18
Posts: 974
Points: 0
|
It's actually serious.
And I updated the survey to include one comment related to education outside the U.S. You can still fill it out, just indicate your nationality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||||
|
Forum Amateur
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 22
Posts: 446
Points: 35
|
Although I live in Canada, I'll still answer the questions as it stands for me. You can still find some use in this by making a comparison of American students' quality of education vs my experiences with the Canadian system, whatever differences that may be.
Quote:
In regards to variety: - a varied number of degrees should be available; ever wonder why some people travel far away from home just to go to a university that has a program for OT training? etc. - a wide variety of courses should be available, and new ones should be introduced from year to year to keep variety going; this would at least have students looking forward to different things and keep up their interests or provide them more ideas for their future careers - a variety of social outlets and extracurricular activity; just because you live in Canada doesn't mean that the majority of socialization have to be beer drinking in bars; just because you live in California doesn't mean that one should just let beach parties/surfing be the biggest form of extracurricular activity; get the community involved in other things In regards to opening doors: - you can't open many doors and opportunities if you can't afford to go to the college you want; I've been to the states several times, and by far the costs for many universities are FAR beyond what Canadian universities have to pay (and that's in part due to the level of gov't contribution on education between the two countries) - only exceptions may be community colleges in the US - course availability - and what I mean by this is that some people are forced to design their schedules based on some courses that are only offered at certain times of the year, or offered every other year, etc.; changing the school's calendar system may fix this; for example, having a trimester system instead of a semester system (3 semesters vs 2 semesters) would increase flexibility amongst profs in regards to their time for contribution and would increase opportunities for students to choose courses with limited availability - in retrospect, this would also reduce the number of waiting lists or "priorities" given to students that major in a certain area - potential job availability and in that respect, internships with various companies; you know, I still wonder what the hell I'll be doing after I graduate In regards to quality: - starting with an obvious one, classroom quality; we're talking about sufficient "supplies", effective "supplies", and effective classroom sizes/number of students enrolled in a course; there are obvious advantages/disadvantages for large and small classroom sizes. Small classroom sizes usually result in increased attentiveness of students paying attention, and more notably, increased attentiveness of professors in tracking the student's progress. Large classroom sizes do not typically offer this kind of attentiveness on both parties, but does promote in a way independent/self-learning and finding resources other than the prof - the atmosphere is more closely relegated to real life, in which you have to independently find your own solutions - you don't have a mentor by your side all the time. - course quality; this includes effective "professors", effective "teaching methods", effective self-checks and evaluations on the system itself. Professor personality: the most enthusiastic professors tend to give the best quality and enjoyment of a course to students; if a Harvard professor isn't that, it's just another professor IMO. And probably one who researches better than he/she can socialize. Teaching methods: there's this current trend of independent learning going on that can be a good and bad thing. Independent learning obviously promotes self-efficiency/self-dependence, etc. which is wholly applicable to real-life situations. However, it sometimes can deviate to the point in which it might be better just to buy the textbook and not even bother enrolling in the course. This applies to situations in which professors encourage this type of learning, or more commonly now, online course offerings where professors are non-existant. Your opinion on this would likely depend on whether you think it's sufficient that students learn self-independence within their coursework, or learn self-independence at their own time. Checks on the system: at the end of every course, students at my university are given a scantron-like T.A./professor evaluation form. They personally evalute them and it really DOES affect the professor's potential job continuity. On occasion, sometimes surveys are offered to your email address. Also, an effective Student Union is very important as a more effective voice for students to reach their concerns out to gov't, university, and other big cheeses. Hence, student council voting is an important process as well. Problems that plagues this is clearly student apathy - in which case more effective communication to get the words out to the public is required (by email, student newsletters/newspaper, etc.). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|